H-beams vs. I-beams: Performance Comparison and Selection Recommendations
H-beams feature parallel flanges with uniform thickness, creating a more balanced load distribution. According to ASTM A6 standards, the flange-to-web thickness ratio typically ranges from 1.2:1 to 1.4:1. In contrast, I-beams have tapered flanges (14° slope per ANSI B4.1) that concentrate stress near the web junction. The wider flange width of H-beams (up to 400mm in European HE series) provides 18-22% greater moment of inertia than equivalent-weight I-beams.
Under vertical loading conditions, H-beams demonstrate 15-30% higher bending resistance due to their optimized section modulus (Z-values). Our laboratory tests on S355JR grade steel show:
For lateral torsion buckling resistance, H-beams' rectangular section provides 2.3× better stability according to Eurocode 3 calculations.
High-rise building frames prioritize H-beams (especially in seismic zones) for their:
I-beams remain preferred for conveyor systems and crane rails due to:
While both have C-shaped cross-sections, channels (UPE/UPN standards) feature thicker webs (5-11mm) for load-bearing walls, whereas C-purlins (Z120-Z350 grades) use thinner galvanized steel (1.5-3mm) for roofing systems.
Equal angles (L50×5 to L200×20) dominate in truss structures, while unequal angles (L60×40×5 to L200×150×18) serve specialized bracketing needs. Our warehouse stocks 86% of ASTM A36 standard sizes with 48-hour cutting service.
With decade-long partnerships with Shougang Group and HBIS, we guarantee:
A: Only for spans <6m with added stiffener plates (increases weight by 20-25%), making H-beams more economical long-term.
A: 3 metric tons for standard profiles, 8 tons for special dimensions. Request a quotation with your technical drawings.
Copyright ©Shandong Ruilian Metal Products Co., Ltd. Rights Reserved